baillie polymorphic: June 2012

Friday, June 29, 2012

TTimes: Japan's leading jockey comes to the U.S.; riding at Churchill Downs this weekend, in California this summer: http://t.co/IGHF8qOx

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://twitter.com/TTimes/statuses/218454454465339392

andrew brietbart branson mo monkees songs danica patrick school closings top chef texas rail gun

Peanuts, Cracker Jacks, and Cotton Candy | My foodMAPs

It?s summertime.? Baseball season is in full swing and so are visits to amusement parks.? What do you usually do at these places ? other than watch the game and ride the roller coaster? EAT, of course!

Oh, the food!? Oh the calories! Trust me ? this post isn?t about ignoring the good time food.? There are always healthy food options:? you can bring your own or be scrupulous in making healthy choices. But honestly, do you think that most people really want to eat low calorie foods when they?re at a ballgame or amusement park? No way.

So what do you do when you?re at these places with food vendors about every 20 feet hawking dogs, ice cream, and beer?

There Are Ways And Then There Are Ways

If you?ve got a will of iron, I guess you could ignore the food and drinks.? But if you?re like most people and you?re tempted at every turn, you can try to minimize the damage without taking away the fun.? If you know you?re going to be having a stadium or food court meal, do some thinking, planning, and sleuthing.? The best choices are not always the obvious ones.

Do you need both peanuts and popcorn?? Can you make do with a regular hot dog instead of a foot-long?? Can you keep it to one or two beers instead of three?? Can you choose the small popcorn instead of the jumbo tub? Can you ditch the soda ? or maybe the second one ? and replace it with water?

Make Your Best Choice

Here?s some info to help you make your best choice.? Just a heads up ? we?re not talking about the most nutritious choice because given these foods, quality nutrition is not front and center.? You can, however, enjoy your day and make the best caloric choice (with a nod to fat and sugar content) and still enjoy traditional ballpark and amusement park food.

Cotton Candy: Nothing but heated and colored sugar that?s spun into threads with added air. Cotton candy on a stick or wrapped around a paper cone (about an ounce) has around 105 calories; a 2oz. bag (common size) has 210. A lot of sugar, but not a lot of calories ? albeit empty ones.

Cracker Jack (officially cracker jack, not jacks): candy-coated popcorn with some peanuts. A 3.5oz stadium size box has 420 calories but does have 7g? protein and 3.5g fiber.

Hamburger: ? 6oz. of beef on a bun has about 490 calories ? without cheese or other toppings ? which up the ante.

Grilled Chicken Sandwich, 6oz.:? 280 calories ? not a bad choice.? 6oz. of chicken tenders clock in at 446 calories.? Barbecue dipping sauce adds 30 calories a tablespoon.

Hot Dog: Most sold-out baseball stadiums can sell 16,000 hot dogs a day. A regular hot dog with mustard has about 290 calories: that?s 180 for the 2oz. dog, 110 for the bun, zilch for regular yellow mustard. Two tbs. sauerkraut adds another 5-10 calories, 2 tbs. ketchup adds 30, and 2 tbs. relish another 40. A Nathan?s hot dog racks up 320 calories; a foot-long Hebrew National 510 calories. Hot dogs are usually loaded with sodium.

Pizza: Stadium pizza is larger than a usual slice, about 1/6 of a 16-inch pie (instead of 1/8) making it about 435 calories a slice.

Super Nachos with Cheese: A 12oz. serving (40 chips, 4oz. cheese) has about 1,500 calories!!! Plain French fries look like a caloric bargain by comparison.

French Fries: A large serving has about 500 calories. A serving of Hardee?s chili cheese fries has 700 calories and 350 of them come from fat.

Potato Chips:? One single serving bag has 153 calories (94 of them from fat).

Peanuts in the Shell: What would a baseball game be without a bag of peanuts? Stadiums can sell as many as 6,000 bags on game days. An 8oz. bag has 840 calories; a 12oz. bag has 1,260. Yes, they have some protein and fiber.? But wow on the calories.

Soft Pretzel: One large soft pretzel has 483 calories ? giant soft pretzels (7-8oz.) have about 700 calories.

Draft Beer: A stadium draft beer, 20oz. cup, the usual size, has about 240 calories. A light draft saves you 60 calories.

Coca Cola:? A 12oz can: 140 calories ?- and close to 10 tsp. of sugar.

Helmet Ice Cream: Your team?s mini-helmet filled with swirly Carvel, 550-590 calories.

Souvenir Popcorn: At Yankee Stadium a jumbo size has 1,484 calories and a souvenir bucket has 2,473 calories.

No related posts.

Source: http://myfoodmaps.com/peanuts-cracker-jacks-and-cotton-candy/

channel 2 news adrienne bailon yelp stock honda classic news channel 5 nashville weather jason varitek

Don't Pay Online Cost-free Paid Surveys, Make On the internet ...

Free Paid Surveys
Daily, new goods and services are entering the marketplace. And before a firm will invest billions of dollars on promoting, its owners require to understand just how much demand there is certainly for their product and what people believe of what they may be looking to sell. These companies will pay good income to study your opinion about their goods and services. As a survey taker you may make several hundred to quite a few thousand dollars a month operating from residence and setting your personal hours.

Operating on cost-free paid surveys is enjoyable straightforward work that lets you set your own hours and pace. You could possibly select to work for thirty minutes prior to you visit bed each and every night. Or you might make a decision to work on your surveys while you happen to be waiting for your children to come dwelling from school within the afternoons. You might even make a decision to take a handful of weeks off from survey taking altogether. In any case, working on cost-free paid surveys enables you to be your personal boss in deciding how much work you need to do and just how much cash you would like to produce.

You?ll find many internet sites around that present access to paid surveys from advertising firms. Some may ask you to sign up and spend an initiation or enrollment fee to possess access to these surveys. But don?t get scammed into paying a fee to work on paid surveys. Organizations are seeking for the opinions of average men and women, not just those with income to spare on application charges. So most providers will pay the internet site directly to be notified of clients that are prepared to full a paid survey. For those who definitely choose to earn money on the net even though voicing your opinion, completing totally free paid surveys is one of the oldest and most confirmed method of undertaking it.

You could possibly be asking yourself how you?ll be paid for this kind of function. Payment may be inside the type of a business examine, mailed straight to you, or via an online service for instance PayPal. Based upon the organization you sign up with, you might be paid by the market place research organization that is definitely conducting the survey, or by the business that created the survey. Just make sure you understand the exact terms of each and every survey ahead of completing the assignment.

The ideal part about operating on totally free paid surveys is the fact that you are in complete control of when, where, and just how much you work. This is the perfect opportunity for everyone who?s thinking about creating some further cash, from remain at property parents, to college students, to seniors. You?ll be able to complete surveys as lots of surveys as you desire within your spare time, operating at your personal pace and inside the atmosphere of your deciding upon. For anyone who is looking to get a solution to make some further cash when keeping hours which can be flexible, then completing free of charge paid surveys may be the ideal job opportunity for you! The link beneath will send you to a website where you can have access to quite a few unique no cost paid surveys.

Order inexpensive Antonio Brown Jersey
from James Harrison Jersey
Online Store right now with Easy-to-take Shipment, Safe and sound Payment & Excellent Support Services from us.

Source: http://answers.carecrunch.com/?p=49807&utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=dont-pay-online-cost-free-paid-surveys-make-on-the-internet-surveys-pay-you

end of the world 2012 pink martini times square 2012 predictions new years eve ball drop new years eve times square 2012 2012 holidays

Thursday, June 28, 2012

Fear of Childbirth Linked to Longer Labor, Study Says

[ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]

[ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]

chesapeake energy dick clark death yom hashoah yolo liquidmetal gsa scandal kelis

Choosing A Retirement Home

Choosing the right retirement home can be a daunting and very challenging task. YOu want to make sure that the golden years of your life are spent comfortably and with the correct care and support. There is a lot of bad press out there regarding the practices of certain retirement homes. How can you avoid becoming a victim to a badly run, or dangerous home?
This article looks at steps you can take to, hopefully, avoid moving to a retirement home that not only doesn't offer you the care you need, but maybe threatens your physical safety. These steps are just pieces of advice, designed to heighten awareness of retirement homes that may not be offering the highest standard of care that you deserve.

- Make sure you visit the home. When visiting the retorement home, note your first impressions.

Is it bright? Clean?? Comfortable? Welcoming? First impressions can tell you a lot, so listen to your gut when you are visiting somewhere. Do you feel happy living out your golden years here? How do the other residents seem?

- Ask for an information pack on the facility. The tour guide should give you one regardless of whether you ask for one. The tour guide will talk about how "great" their nursing home is. The benefit with such a pack is that you can read through it in your own time once you have visited the home. Make sure that what the informatiokn pack says, matches what you have seen.

- Look at other residents, do they look clean and neat? Do they look like they are well cared for? Are their faces, hands and hair clean? I know we have touched on this in the first point, but it is very important.

Other residents should look like they are well looked after. If you see residents who have not been washed, or there are a lot of strange odours surrounding particular residents, you may wish to think twice before you choose to move in.

- Look at the floor in the corners; look at the walls, under beds at the furnishings. Are they clean? Make sure you look carefully at all aspects of cleanliness. Are the staff washing their hands frequently? Are carpets clean? Is there a lot of dust and grime about? All these questions should be at the forefront of your mind as you look around a retirement home. If the staff aren't too bothered about hygeine, you should be very worried.

All the above steps are designed to make you aware of what to look out for when you investigate a retirement home. It is going to be one of the biggest decisions of your life, choosing where to live out your retirement. You are going to want support, and peace of mind. You will want to live somewhere clean and live alongside staff who genuinly care about your standard of living. Make sure that you make the right decision. Don't let a tour guide fob you off when you want to know something specific. You should not be denied access when wishing to look somewhere, in the home, ?that will effect you when you are living there.

fred thompson fred thompson red hook romney tax return the tree of life movie academy award nominees 2012 2012 oscar nominations

Liveblog: New Android OS, Nexus Tablet to Headline Google I/O

Today marks the launch of Google's 2012 developer conference, Google I/O. Wired is here at the Moscone Center for the event, and will be liveblogging the keynote beginning at 9:30 a.m. Pacific time.

ghost ship tiger woods masters jet crash virginia beach petrino clayton kershaw fab melo tyler perry

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The Real Estate Buying Process ? San Diego Real Estate ? Video ...

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

brady quinn brady quinn obama sweet home chicago accenture match play fat tuesday king cake george washington carver

Issa Writes Obama to Denounce Executive Privilege Ploy

Following up on a tip Sunday to ABC News' Jake Tapper on ' This Week,' Rep. Darrell Issa, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform committee, has sent a letter to President Obama that challenges the president's invocation of executive privilege as the committee seeks documents from the Department of Justice detailing the Obama administration's role in the Fast and Furious gun walking operation.

In the 7-page letter dated June 25, Issa writes that the highest courts in the country have held that the assertion of the constitutionally-based executive privilege "is only applicable with respect to documents and communications that implicate the confidentiality of the President's decision-making process, defined as those documents and communications to and from the President and his most senior advisors."

Issa, R-Calif., then questions Obama whether Attorney General Eric Holder or anyone at the White House was involved in a cover-up.

"Your privilege assertion means one of two t hings," he writes. "Either you or your most senior advisors were involved in managing Operation Fast & Furious and the fallout from it, including the false February 4, 2011 letter provided by the Attorney General to the Committee, or, you are asserting a Presidential power that you know to be unjustified solely for the purpose of further obstructing a congressional investigation."

Issa previously told Tapper that the letter would break down "why the president's executive privilege claim is either overbroad or simply wrong." He maintains that he only broke off negotiations for the documents with Holder when the committee "got a flat refusal to give us information needed for our investigation."

"Our hope is that, as to at least a lot of these documents, including the documents often referred to as 1300, that were offered to us in this deal, that at least since those were offered to us, that?we would see them," Issa told Tapper on Sunday. "If those documents say what Eric Holder says they say, we might, in fact, dismiss contempt in either case, but I can tell you one thing here: If we get documents that?cast some doubt or allow us to understand this, we'll at least delay contempt and continue the process."

In the letter, Issa once again states that he is holding out hope that DOJ will comply with his subpoena request prior to a vote on a contempt citation in the full House of Representatives that's scheduled for Thursday. He also calls on the administration to enumerate "the universe of documents over which [Obama] asserted executive privilege and provide the Committee with the legal justification from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel," and he makes another run at White House documents.

"So that the Committee and the public can better understand your role, and the role of your most senior advisors, in connection with Operation Fast and Furious, please clarify the question raised by your assertion of executive privilege: To what extent were you or your most senior advisors involved in Operation Fast and Furious and the fallout from it, including the false February 4, 2011 letter provided by the Attorney General to the Committee?" Issa demands. "Please also identify any communications, meetings, and teleconferences between the White House and the Justice Department between February 4, 2011 and June 18, 2012, the day before the Attorney General requested that you assert executive privilege."

If a resolution is not reached, the House is expected to approve the contempt citation on Thursday in what would become the first instance of either chamber of Congress voting to hold the U.S. attorney general in contempt of Congress. Last week Issa's committee voted along party lines to send the contempt resolution on to the full House.

Issa's full letter to the president is copied below:

June 25, 2012

The President The White House Washington, D.C. 20500

Dear Mr. President:

On June 19, 2012, shortly after leaving a meeting in the U.S. Capitol, Attorney General Eric Holder wrote to request that you assert executive privilege with respect to Operation Fast and Furious documents he is withholding from this Committee. The next day, Deputy Attorney General James Cole notified me in a letter that you had invoked executive privilege. The Committee received both letters minutes before the scheduled start of a vote to recommend that the full House hold the Attorney General in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with its subpoena.

Courts have consistently held that the assertion of the constitutionally-based executive privilege - the only privilege that ever can justify the withholding of documents from a congressional committee by the Executive Branch - is only applicable with respect to documents and communications that implicate the confidentiality of the President's decision-making process, defined as those documents and communications to and from the President and his most senior advisors. Even then, it is a qualified privilege that is overcome by a showing of the committee's need for the documents. The letters from Messrs. Holder and Cole cited no case law to the contrary.

Accordingly, your privilege assertion means one of two things. Either you or your most senior advisors were involved in managing Operation Fast & Furious and the fallout from it, including the false February 4, 2011 letter provided by the Attorney General to the Committee, or, you are asserting a Presidential power that you know to be unjustified solely for the purpose of further obstructing a congressional investigation. To date, the White House has steadfastly maintained that it has not had any role in advising the Department with respect to the congressional investigation. The surprising assertion of executive privilege raised the question of whether that is still the case.

As you know, the Committee voted to recommend that the full House hold Attorney General Holder in contempt of Congress for his continued refusal to produce relevant documents in the investigation of Operation Fast and Furious. Last week's proceeding would not have occurred had the Attorney General actually produced the subpoenaed documents he said he could provide. The House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on the contempt resolution this week. I remain hopeful that the Attorney General will produce the specified documents so that we can work towards resolving this matter short of a contempt citation. Furthermore, I am hopeful that, consistent with assertions of executive privilege by previous Administrations, you will define the universe of documents over which you asserted executive privilege and provide the Committee with the legal justification from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC).

Background

U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed in a firefight with a group of armed Mexican bandits who preyed on illegal immigrants in a canyon west of Rio Rico, Arizona on December 14, 2010. Two guns traced to Operation Fast and Furious were found at the murder scene. The Terry family appeared before the Committee on June 15, 2011, to ask for answers about the program that put guns in the hands of the men who killed their son and brother. Having been stonewalled for months by the Attorney General and his senior staff, the Committee issued a subpoena for documents that would provide the Terry family the answers they seek. The subpoena was served on October 12, 2011.

Internally, over the course of the next eight months, the Justice Department identified 140,000 pages of documents and communications responsive to the Committee's subpoena. Yet, the Department handed over only 7,600 of these pages. Through a series of accommodations and in recognition of certain Executive Branch and law enforcement prerogatives, the Committee prioritized key documents the Department needed to produce to avoid contempt proceedings. These key documents would help the Committee understand how and why the Justice Department moved from denying whistleblower allegations to understanding they were true; the identities of officials who attempted to retaliate against whistleblowers; the reactions of senior Department officials when confronted with evidence of gunwalking during Fast and Furious, including whether they were surprised or already aware of the use of this reckless tactic, and; whether senior Department officials are being held to the same standard as lower-level employees who have been blamed for Fast and Furious by their politically-appointed bosses in Washington.

I met with Attorney General Holder on June 19, 2012, to attempt to resolve this matter in advance of the Committee's scheduled contempt vote. We were joined by Ranking Member Elijah Cummings and Senators Patrick Leahy and Charles Grassley, respectively the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. The Department had previously identified a small subset of documents created after February 4, 2011 - the date of its letter containing the false claim that no gunwalking had occurred - that it would make available to the Committee. The Justice Department described this small subset as a "fair compilation" of the full universe of post-February 4th documents responsive to the subpoena.

During the June 19th meeting, the Attorney General stated he wanted to "buy peace." He indicated a willingness to produce the "fair compilation" of post-February 4th documents. He told me that he would provide the "fair compilation" of documents on three conditions: (1) that I permanently cancel the contempt vote; (2) that I agree the Department was in full compliance with the Committee's subpoenas, and; (3) that I accept the "fair compilation," sight unseen.

As Chairman of the primary investigative Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, I considered the Attorney General's conditions unacceptable, as would have my predecessors from both sides of the aisle. I simply requested that the Department produce the "fair compilation" in advance of the contempt vote, with the understanding that I would postpone the vote to allow the Committee to review the documents.

The short meeting in the Capitol lasted about twenty minutes. The Attorney General left the meeting and, shortly thereafter, sent an eight-page letter containing more than forty citations requesting that you assert executive privilege. The following morning, the Deputy Attorney General informed me that you had taken the extraordinary step of asserting the privilege that is designed to protect presidential decision making.

In his letter, the Attorney General stated that releasing the documents covered by the subpoena, some of which he offered to the Committee hours earlier, would have "significant, damaging consequences." [1] It remains unclear how - in a matter of hours - the Attorney General moved from offering those documents in exchange for canceling the contempt vote and ending the congressional investigation to claiming that they are covered by executive privilege and that releasing them - which the Attorney General was prepared to do hours earlier - would now result in "significant, damaging consequences."

The Scope of Executive Privilege

Deputy Attorney General Cole's representation that "the President has asserted executive privilege over the relevant post-February 4, 2011, documents" raised concerns that there was greater White House involvement in Operation Fast and Furious than previously thought. [2] The courts have never considered executive privilege to extend to internal Executive Branch deliberative documents.

Absent from the Attorney General's eight-page letter were the controlling authorities from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. As the court held in the seminal case of In re Sealed Case (Espy):

The privilege should not extend to staff outside the White House in executive branch agencies. Instead, the privilege should apply only to communications authored or solicited and received by those members of an immediate White House adviser's staff who have broad and significant responsibility for investigating and formulating the advice to be given the President on the particular matter to which the communications relate. [3]

The D.C. Circuit established the "operational proximity test" to determine which communications are subject to privilege. Espy made clear that it is "operational proximity to the President that matters in determining whether the president's confidentiality interest is implicated." [4]

In addition, even if the presidential communications privilege did apply to some of these subpoenaed documents, Espy made clear that "the presidential communications privilege is, at all times, a qualified one," and that a showing of need could overcome it. [5] Such a need - indeed a compelling one - plainly exists in this case.

The Justice Department has steadfastly maintained that the documents sought by the Committee do not implicate the White House whatsoever. If true, they are at best deliberative documents between and among Department personnel who lack the requisite "operational proximity" to the President. As such, they cannot be withheld pursuant to the constitutionally-based executive privilege. Courts distinguish between the presidential communications privilege and the deliberative process privilege. Both, the Espy court observed, are executive privileges designed to protect the confidentiality of Executive Branch decision-making. The deliberative-process privilege, however, which applies to executive branch officials generally, is a common law privilege that requires a lower threshold of need to be overcome, and "disappears altogether when there is any reason to believe government misconduct has occurred." [6]

The Committee must assume that the White House Counsel's Office is fully aware of the prevailing authorities of Espy, discussed above, and Judicial Watch v. Dep't of Justice. [7] If the invocation of executive privilege was proper, it calls into question a number of public statements about the involvement of the White House made by you, your staff, and the Attorney General.

Finally, the Attorney General's letter to you cited numerous authorities from prior Administrations of both parties. It is important to note that the OLC opinions provided as authorities to justify expansive views of executive privilege are inconsistent with existing case law.

Remarks about White House Involvement in Fast and Furious

For the past sixteen months, Senator Grassley and I have been investigating Operation Fast and Furious. In response to a question about the operation during an interview with Univision on March 22, 2011, you stated that, "Well first of all, I did not authorize it. Eric Holder, the Attorney General, did not authorize it." [8] You also stated that you were "absolutely not" informed about Operation Fast and Furious. [9] Later in the interview, you said that "there may be a situation here in which a serious mistake was made and if that's the case then we'll find out and we'll hold somebody accountable." [10]

From the early stages of the investigation, the White House has maintained that no White House personnel knew anything about Operation Fast and Furious. Your assertion of executive privilege, however, renews questions about White House involvement.

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney emphasized your denial that you knew about Fast and Furious. Mr. Carney stated, "I can tell you that, as the president has already said, he did not know about or authorize this operation." [11] A few weeks later, Mr. Carney reiterated the point, stating, "I think he made clear . . . during the Mexican state visit and the press conference he had then that he found out about this through news reports. And he takes it very seriously." [12]

In an October 6, 2011 news conference, you maintained that Attorney General Holder "indicated that he was not aware of what was happening in Fast and Furious." [13] Regarding your own awareness, you went on to state, "Certainly I was not. And I think both he and I would have been very unhappy if somebody had suggested that guns were allowed to pass through that could have been prevented by the United States of America." [14]

On March 28, 2012, Senator Grassley and I wrote to Kathryn Ruemmler, who serves as your Counsel, to request that she grant our numerous requests to interview Kevin O'Reilly, a member of the White House National Security Staff. We needed Mr. O'Reilly's testimony to ascertain the extent of White House involvement in Operation Fast and Furious. In her response, Ms. Ruemmler advised us that the e-mail communications between Mr. O'Reilly and William Newell, the Special Agent in Charge of ATF's Phoenix Field Division, did not reveal "the existence of any of the inappropriate investigative tactics at issue in your inquiry, let alone any decision to allow guns to 'walk.'" [15] She further emphasized "the absence of any evidence that suggests that Mr. O'Reilly had any involvement in 'Operation Fast and Furious' or was aware of the existence of any inappropriate investigative tactics." [16] Your assertion of executive privilege renews concerns about these denials.

Earlier this month, when House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith asked the Attorney General when the Justice Department first informed the White House about the questionable tactics used in Fast and Furious, he responded, "I don't know." [17] He informed Chairman Smith that his focus was on "dealing with the problems associated with Fast and Furious," and that he was "not awfully concerned about what the knowledge was in the White House." [18]

Attorney General Holder has assured the public that he takes this matter very seriously, stating that "to the extent we find that mistakes occurred, people will be held accountable." [19] Yet, he has described the Committee's vote as "an election-year tactic." [20] Nothing could be further from the truth. This statement not only betrays a total lack of understanding of our investigation, it exemplifies the stonewalling we have consistently faced in attempting to work with the Justice Department. If the Attorney General had produced the responsive documents more than eight months ago when they were due, or at any time since then, we would not be where we are today.

Moving Forward

At the heart of the congressional investigation into Operation Fast and Furious are disastrous consequences: a murdered Border Patrol Agent, his grieving family, countless deaths in Mexico, and the souring effect on our relationship with Mexico. Members of the Committee from both sides of the aisle agree that the Terry family deserves answers. So, too, do Agent Terry's brothers-in-arms in the border patrol, the Mexican government, and the American people. Unfortunately, your assertion of executive privilege raises more questions than it answers. The Attorney General's conditional offer of a "fair compilation" of a subset of documents covered by the subpoena, and your assertion of executive privilege, in no way substitute for the fact that the Justice Department is still grossly deficient in its compliance with the Committee's subpoena. By the Department's own admission, it has withheld more than 130,000 pages of responsive documents.

I still believe that a settlement, rendering further contempt of Congress proceedings unnecessary, is in the best interests of the Justice Department, Congress, and those most directly affected by Operation Fast and Furious. In light of the settled law that confines the constitutionally-based executive privilege to high-level White House communications, I urge you to reconsider the decision to withhold documents that would allow Congress to complete its investigation.

In the meantime, so that the Committee and the public can better understand your role, and the role of your most senior advisors, in connection with Operation Fast and Furious, please clarify the question raised by your assertion of executive privilege: To what extent were you or your most senior advisors involved in Operation Fast and Furious and the fallout from it, including the false February 4, 2011 letter provided by the Attorney General to the Committee? Please also identify any communications, meetings, and teleconferences between the White House and the Justice Department between February 4, 2011 and June 18, 2012, the day before the Attorney General requested that you assert executive privilege.

I appreciate your prompt attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,

Darrell Issa Chairman

cc: The Honorable Elijah E. Cummings, Ranking Member Committee on Oversight and Government Reform U.S. House of Representatives

Senator Charles E. Grassley, Ranking Member Committee on the Judiciary U.S. Senate

Senator Patrick Leahy, Chairman Committee on the Judiciary U.S. Senate

The Honorable Kathryn Ruemmler, Counsel to the President

[1] Letter from U.S. Att'y Gen. Eric H. Holder, Jr. to the President (June 19, 2012), at 2. [2] Letter from Deputy U.S. Att'y Gen. James Cole to Chairman Issa (June 20, 2012). [3] In re Sealed Case (Espy), 121 F.3d 729 (D.C. Cir. 1997). [4] Id. [5] Id. [6] Congressional Research Service, Presidential Claims of Executive Privilege: History, Law, Practice, and Recent Developments (Aug. 21, 2008). [7] 365 F.3d 1108 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (holding that presidential communications privilege only applied to documents "solicited and received" by the President or his immediate advisers). [8] Interview by Jorge Ramos, Univision, with President Barack Obama, San Salvador, El Salvador (Mar. 22, 2011). [9] Id. [10] Id. [11] The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jay Carney (June 17, 2011). [12] The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, Press Briefing by Press Secretary Jay Carney (July 5, 2011). [13] Richard Serrano, Obama Defends Attorney General: Holder Faces Scrutiny over ATF's Fast and Furious Gun Operation, Charlotte Observer, Oct. 7, 2011. [14] Id. [15] Letter from Hon. Kathryn Ruemmler, Counsel to the President, to Hon. Darrell E. Issa, Chairman, H. Comm. on Oversight & Gov't Reform, & Sen. Charles E. Grassley, Ranking Member, S. Comm. on the Judiciary (Apr. 5, 2012). [16] Id. [17] Oversight of the U.S. Dep't of Justice: Hearing Before the H. Comm. on the Judiciary, 112th Cong. (June 7, 2012) (Test. of U.S. Att'y Gen. Eric H. Holder, Jr.). [18] Id. [19] Mike Levine, Guns Groups To Sue over New Obama Regulations, DOJ Vows To "Vigorously Oppose," FoxNews.com, Aug. 3, 2011, http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/08/03/guns-groups-to-sue-over-new-obama-regulations-doj-vows-to-vigorously-oppose/#ixzz1yRMujaLY. [20] Congress Contempt Charge for U.S. Attorney General Holder, BBC News, June 21, 2012, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-18528798.

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Driveway Paver, Driveways Paver to Transform Your Home Exter ...

[unable to retrieve full-text content]However, concrete does offer attractive and cost effective solutions to a number of other home improvement projects, and concrete landscaping is just one of the many areas where concrete could be the perfect fit for your own ...

soul train nevada caucus ufc 143 what time does the super bowl start ben gazzara nfl hall of fame 2012 ufc diaz vs condit

Christie Brinkley And Peter Cook Settle Divorce ... - Huffington Post

QUESTION: Which actor had his visitation rights suspended after a recording of him calling his daughter names was publicized?

a) Chevy Chase b) Alec Baldwin c) Mel Gibson d) Charlie Sheen

ANSWER: Alec Baldwin

Alec Baldwin's <a href="http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20144854,00.html" target="_hplink">cut-throat custody battle</a> with ex Kim Basinger over their daughter Ireland made headlines again in 2007, when a voicemail message in which the actor <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2007/04/22/alecs-threatening-message/" target="_hplink">berated his daughter as a "rude little pig" was made public</a>. The message reportedly led to the suspension of <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2007/04/22/alecs-threatening-message/" target="_hplink">Baldwin's visitation rights.</a> The actor, who said he was a <a href="http://www.people.com/people/news/category/0,,personsTax:KimBasinger,00.html" target="_hplink">victim of parental alienation</a>, has <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/26/alec-baldwin-will-be-the-_n_910215.html" target="_hplink">regained custody rights</a> and reportedly gotten a hold of his temper. "After the incident with the voicemail, he learned to restrain himself," Basinger's brother, Skip, <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20344103,00.html" target="_hplink">told People</a> in February 2010.

QUESTION: Which rocker accused her ex of burning one of their children with a cigarette?

a) Melissa Etheridge b) Sheryl Crow c) Courtney Love d) Patti Smith

ANSWER: Melissa Etheridge

In April 2012, <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2012/04/10/melissa-etheridge-divorce-tammy-lynn-michaels/" target="_hplink">TMZ reported</a> that Melissa Etheridge filed legal documents claiming that former domestic partner Tammy Lynn Michaels had accidentally burned one of the children with cigarette.The singer <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/10/melissa-etheridge-tammy-l_n_1415816.html" target="_hplink">reportedly requested more time</a> with the couple's five-year-old twins and claimed that Michaels was against joint custody. In May 2012, <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2012/05/22/melissa-etheridge-custody-war-settled-tammy-lynn-michaels/" target="_hplink">TMZ reported</a> that the pair had agreed to joint custody.

QUESTION: Which basketball star was awarded sole custody of his children during his custody battle?

a) Kobe Bryant b) Dennis Rodman c) Dwayne Wade d) Michael Jordan

ANSWER: Dwayne Wade

In March 2011, a Chicago court awarded Dwayne Wade <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/13/dwyane-wade-custody-battle_n_835101.html" target="_hplink">sole "care, custody and control"</a> of his two sons, following a bitter custody battle with ex-wife Siohvaughn Wade. At the time of the ruling, the Miami Heat player told the Associated Press that "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/13/dwyane-wade-custody-battle_n_835101.html" target="_hplink">a huge weight is off my back</a>." The NBA star added, "My life changed in a huge way. Mentally, I've been preparing for it for over a year now. To me, it's bigger than that. For me, it shows a lot of people that you need to fight to be in your kids' lives sometimes. You fight until you can't fight any more. That's all I was trying to be, a father in his kids' lives."

QUESTION: Which actor's failed battle for full custody of his daughter lasted six years?

a) Al Pacino b) Robert De Niro c)Harvey Keitel d) James Gandolfini

ANSWER: Harvey Keitel

Though never married, Harvey Keitel and Lorraine Bracco each sought full custody of daughter, Stella, after they split. During the custody battle, Keitel accused <a href="http://blog.sfgate.com/dailydish/2007/05/25/bracco-opens-up-about-cheating-on-keitel/" target="_hplink">Bracco of cheating on him</a> with actor Edward James Olmos -- who'd she go on to <a href="http://www.biography.com/people/edward-james-olmos-189135" target="_hplink">marry and divorce </a>-- while she allegedly claimed that <a href="http://xfinity.comcast.net/slideshow/entertainment-starcustodybattle/17/" target="_hplink">Keitel was abusive</a>. In 1999, <a href="http://articles.nydailynews.com/2001-03-01/entertainment/18170712_1_dr-jennifer-melfi-lorraine-bracco-tony-soprano/2" target="_hplink">six years after the battle began</a>, Bracco was awarded <a href="http://images.eonline.com/celebrities/profile/index.jsp?uuid=929f5dc5-1628-4bf3-840d-ddf7234ccacc" target="_hplink">full custody, while Keitel was granted visitation rights</a>.

QUESTION: Which actress has been fighting for child custody since splitting from her model boyfriend in 2010?

a) Vanessa Williams b) Rebecca Romijn c) Teri Hatcher d) Halle Berry

Halle Berry and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/30/halle-berry-gabriel-aubry_n_558307.html" target="_hplink">Gabriel Aubry split in April 2010</a> after nearly five years together, and have been embroiled in a custody battle over their daughter, Nahla, ever since. In January 2012, the couple's nanny made allegations that Aubry <a href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/46117436/ns/today-entertainment/t/halle-berrys-ex-accused-shoving-girls-nanny/#.T71ktEWvKSo" target="_hplink">pushed her while she was holding Nahla</a>, a claim which the Canadian model denied. After investigating the claim, the Los Angeles Department of Children & Family <a href="http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/03/gabriel-aubry-halle-berry-custody-cps-glowing-report" target="_hplink">deemed Aubry a "loving and attentive father"</a> in March 2012. The case is ongoing.

QUESTION: Which esteemed director was labeled a "self-absorbed, untrustworthy and insensitive" father by a judge during his custody battle?

a) Martin Scorsese b) Francis Ford Coppola c) Woody Allen d) Terrence Malick

ANSWER: Woody Allen

In June 1993, Woody Allen was <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1993-06-08/news/mn-865_1_custody-trial" target="_hplink">denied custody</a> of the three children (one biological, two adopted) he shared with Mia Farrow. <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/1993-06-08/news/mn-865_1_custody-trial" target="_hplink">According to the LA Times</a>, the acting judge called the director's petition for custody "frivolous," adding that Allen had "demonstrated no parenting skills that would qualify him as an adequate custodian" for the children. The judge also reportedly denounced the director for his <a href="http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20110668,00.html" target="_hplink">romantic relationship</a> with Farrow's adopted daughter, Soon-Yi Previn, whom Farrow adopted with her ex-husband Andr? Previn. Allen and Soon-Yi <a href="http://www.cnn.com/SHOWBIZ/9712/24/woody.weds/" target="_hplink">married in 1997</a>.

QUESTION: Which television star was called "bizarre and delusional" by her estranged husband during their custody battle?

a) Debra Messing b) Anne Heche c) Kristin Davis d) Calista Flockhart

ANSWER: Anne Heche

In May 2007, Anne Heche's ex, Coley Laffoon, claimed in court documents that the actress illustrated <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20039404,00.html" target="_hplink">"bizarre and delusional behavior"</a> and was <a href="http://www.eonline.com/print/index.jsp?uuid=8e4a2b02-f9b4-474e-b5f4-6cab1ffa34c6&contentType=newsStory" target="_hplink">psychologically unfit</a> to care for their toddler son, Homer. Meanwhile, Heche accused Laffon of leaving the toddler with nannies and baby sitters while he "<a href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/18853085/ns/today-entertainment/t/anne-heche-blasts-husband-custody-feud/#.T71aAUWvKSo" target="_hplink">plays ping-pong, backgammon and poker and views pornography online</a>." A judge <a href="http://www.eonline.com/news/heche_hubby_reach_custody_accord/55370" target="_hplink">awarded Heche and Laffoon joint custody of Homer</a> in June 2007.

QUESTION: Which pop star lost custody of her children in 2007?

a) Britney Spears b) Brandy c) Christina Aguilera d) Pink

ANSWER: Britney Spears

In October 2007, a judge ordered Britney Spears to relinquish physical custody of her two sons, Sean Preston and Jayden James, <a href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/21087621/ns/today-entertainment/t/britney-spears-loses-custody-children/#.T71P0kWvKSo" target="_hplink">citing the pop star's drug and alcohol</a> use. The judge granted Spears' ex, Kevin Federline, custody of the kids. Though she fought to regain custody, Spears agreed to give him <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,385582,00.html" target="_hplink">sole legal and physical custody</a> in July 2008 and settled for continued visitation rights of the boys. Since then, the couple have reportedly moved <a href="http://health.howstuffworks.com/pregnancy-and-parenting/parenting/5-celebrity-custody-battles3.htm" target="_hplink">closer to shared custody</a>.

QUESTION: Which reality TV star hesitated to publicly acknowledge her boyfriend as the father of her child?

a) Heidi Klum b) Giada De Laurentiis c) Padma Lakshmi d) Tyra Banks

ANSWER: Padma Lakshmi

Though Padma Lakshmi dated Michael Dell from November 2006 until September 2009, <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20578775,00.html" target="_hplink">she hesitated to publicly acknowledge him</a> as the father of her baby. Dell, a venture capitalist, <a href="http://www.nypost.coM/p/news/local/manhattan/padma_lakshmi_adam_dell_fight_over_hdpkgxc35ir0KId4IVUA4K" target="_hplink">filed for full custody</a> of the girl, Krishna, in January 2011, claiming that Lakshmi had tried to "<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/m/story?id=12771895&sid=75&p=4" target="_hplink">minimize, if not eliminate [his] role in Krishna's life</a>." In March 2012, the couple resolved their custody battle with a resolution that granted Dell <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/16/padma-lakshmi-custody-battle_n_1354670.html" target="_hplink">expanded visitation rights and legal recognition of his paternity</a> of Krishna, who now carries both Lakshmi's and Dell's last names.

jim caldwell internet blackout jessica capshaw seattle times seattle times walker recall censor

Egypt denies Morsi gave interview to Iran's Fars agency

heejun han donovan mcnabb donovan mcnabb lottery ticket megga millions what is autism the giver

Paraguay's ousted Lugo calls for return to democracy

quadrantid norv turner jerry angelo work it amy chua iowa gop meteor shower tonight

Monday, June 25, 2012

Reasons Concierge Services are Popular | Travel Insurance Review

Reasons Concierge Services are Popular Before the age of the Internet, travelers had only their travel agents in brick-and-mortar establishments to turn to for pre-trip planning and travel emergencies. These days, travel insurance plans, especially package plans, include concierge services.

Much like the well-connected and industrious hotel concierge of old, these concierge services help travelers solve a wide range of problems such as finding cars for hire, scoring exclusive reservations or tickets, setting up tee times, making emergency travel arrangements, and procuring items.

If you?ve always wondered how those travel insurance concierge services might be useful to your on your trip, here are a few reasons to tap into them.

1. They have the power of language on their side

What if you need to make a reservation, find transportation, or reserve a guide in a foreign country, or even somewhere very remote? Concierge services have multilingual staff who can coordinate what you need and communicate it back to you in your own language.

2. Unlike your hotel concierge, you are not obligated to tip

There are no additional charges for the services delivered by your travel insurance plan provider. Essentially, you?ve already paid for the service with your travel insurance plan cost and there?s no obligation to tip.

3. Delegate those research tasks you don?t have time to do

Most people these days are busy with work, family, and social obligations and don?t have the time or the tools it takes to spend finding the right hotel, the perfect yoga class, an overseas babysitter, or transportation to and from the airport. A good concierge service saves their customers precious time.

4. They have access to local experts on the ground

Sure, we?ve all got access to the search engines, but why search blindly on the Internet when you can ask for a personal recommendation from a local expert? Just like the hotel concierges of old, your concierge service will be able to remove the unknown element and give you trusted information.

5. Some have extras like roadside assistance and identity theft protection

Some travel insurance concierge services include extras like help resolving identity theft crises and roadside assistance (usually with a deductible). These benefits can help a traveler facing a critical emergency while on a vacation or business trip. See our review of travel insurance concierge services with a list of policies that offer it.

6. They are available 24/7 using a toll-free hotline

Not all hotel concierges are available 24/7 and certainly not by phone. A travel insurance concierge service is available by calling a toll-free number from anywhere in the world.

Important notes about concierge services

A concierge service may not be for every traveler. Some travelers prefer to do the research on their own and some feel they don?t need external help, but for those situations where even the most confident traveler would like some help, it might be handy to tap into your concierge service.

Here are some important items to note about travel insurance concierge services:

Some travel insurance companies have their own travel assistance services staff and others farm those responsibilities out to an independent company.
You are always responsible for the charges related to the actual cost of merchandise or charges for services arranged by your concierge services.
You have access to these services as soon as you purchase your travel insurance plan, so they are available for pre-trip planning as well as travel emergencies.

It?s also important to note that your concierge service staff can?t do everything. For example, they can?t plan your destination wedding, but they can get you in touch with a wedding planner.

We?ve also read that the services clients with high-end credit cards ? those that charge in the hundreds of dollars in annual fees ? have better concierge service. So, some travelers may want to tap into their credit card benefits to see what?s available as well.

Be careful with trusting your credit card benefits too much, however, because those services can?t help you with emergency medical evacuations, finding local medical care, and other travel emergencies that are covered by your typical travel insurance plan.

ground hog day florida primary results black history groundhogs day paula abdul mitt romney cinnamon challenge

Sunday, June 24, 2012

A Loan by Any Other Name May Not Smell As Sweet ? Merchant ...

You?ve done the deed and written your business plan ? now you?re ready to move onto finding those pesky funds needed to startup and/or keep your small business up and running.

Or are you?

As a small business owner no one knows more about the nature of your business than you do.? Can you say the same when it comes to knowing about the various types of funding available?

Unless you have prior experience obtaining small business loans (and even if you do) your answer may well be ?No.?? Of course you may not be one of those ?bean counter? types and prefer to leave all that mumbo jumbo to the experts.

However, the fact is you are on a mission to make a purchase.? In this case you?re out to buy yourself some money.? If you were going to go buy a car would you let the salesman pick out what make, model and options you wanted to buy?? Of course not.

Knowledge is power, so let?s power up and review some basic options for funding your small business.

The ?D? Word

There are two main types of funding available for start-ups:? debt financing and equity financing.

You?ll probably be most familiar with debt financing.? This means a loan which must be paid back according to a specific schedule of payments, in a specific amount, most usually with a specified rate of interest applied, and within a specified period of time.

Simply stated, with debt financing, you borrow t money and agree to pay it back in a particular time frame at a specified rate of interest.

Debt financing is not just a risk for the person or institution that does the lending.? When using debt financing methods the loan must be repaid whether or not the business succeeds.? You, the business owner, assumes this debt even should the business fail.

Banks loans are a type debt financing, as are loans from family and/or friends.? Using existing credit available to you (i.e. credit cards, real estate or other equity loans) is also a form of debt financing.

We?re Not Talking Home Equity Loans

Equity financing may sound the same as using the equity you have in your home or other investments to secure a loan to fund your business.? But equity financing is different than using personal equity (such as real estate) to secure a loan.? When a small business uses equity financing, the owner ?sells? partial ownership of the company in exchange for the funds received.

Unlike debt financing where it is the business owner who must repay the loan even should the business fail, equity financiers assume all or part of the risk should the venture fail.? This sounds like a much better deal for the business owner, but when assessing what is best for your small business, you must take into consideration that equity funders normally anticipate a much greater return on their investment than banks, or friends and family (translation: you may pay equity investor more in terms of return than you would paying interest if using debt financing.)

Another thing to consider is that it is also common for equity investors to become rather involved in the companies they fund.? As a small business owner you may be very hesitant to allow others to have a ?hands on? influence on how you run your business.? On the plus side is the fact that equity funders are taking a big risk but only when they anticipate a big return ? so they are usually quite experienced in the ability to identify good business models and then help build the startup into a successful business.

patti stanger pasadena pasadena famu famu martina mcbride terry jones

Iranian general: military strike would be the end of Israel

DUBAI: A high-ranking Iranian general said on Saturday Israeli military action against Iran's nuclear programme would lead to the collapse of the Jewish state, Fars news agency reported.

Last week's round of nuclear talks between Iran and world powers in Moscow failed to secure a breakthrough, heightening fears Israel might take unilateral military action to curb Iran's nuclear activities.

The two sides agreed to a follow-up meeting of technical experts on July 3, saving the process from outright failure.

"They cannot do the slightest harm to the (Iranian) revolution and the system," Brigadier General Mostafa Izadi, deputy chief of staff of Iran's armed forces, told Fars.

"If the Zionist regime takes any (military) actions against Iran, it would result in the end of its labours," he added.

"If they act logically, such threats amount to a psychological war but if they want to act illogically, it is they who will be destroyed."

Izadi's comments are an apparent response to Israeli Vice Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz's calls for tougher sanctions against Tehran and his indication that military action was still an option.

Analysts say Iranian officials use such rhetoric as a way of stoking Western concerns of chaos in the Middle East and the disruption of oil supplies in the event of military action.

During negotiations in Moscow the six powers - the United States, China, Russia, France, Britain and Germany - demanded Iran scale back its nuclear work and, in particular, stop enriching uranium to levels that could bring it close to making an atom bomb.

The demands included the shutting down of the Fordow underground uranium enrichment facility and the shipping of any stockpile out of the country.

In return, they offered fuel to keep Iran's medical isotope reactor running, assistance in nuclear safety and an end to a ban on spare parts for Iran's ageing civilian aircraft.

Iran denies its work has any military purpose and says the powers should offer it relief from sanctions and acknowledge its right to enrich uranium before it meets their demands.

weather chicago swizz beatz mpaa south carolina debate lauren scruggs william shatner seattle weather

PaulChappell: Great preaching at campout this year! Now heading to a wedding at church!

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

new ipad release pregnant jessica simpson international womens day joe the plumber lra lra eric johnson

Saturday, June 23, 2012

Colombia justice minister resigns over controversial reform

dierks bentley kenny chesney blake shelton academy of country music awards brad paisley zac brown band aubrey